Who wants some vitriol? Free samples here. How 'bout a little vitriol? Excuse me, can i have a side of vitriol? Its vitriol time. More vitriol, less filling. Come get some... vitriol. Gotta get me some vitriol. Mmm... vitriol. Your first Vitriol is free.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Is Salesforce.com 100x as efficient as Amazon?

The Efficient Cloud: All Of Salesforce Runs On Only 1,000 Servers

The raw numbers in this article are pretty interesting:

Salesforce talked about its own back-end infrastructure and revealed that all of Salesforce.com runs on only about 1,000 servers. And that is mirrored, so it is really only 500. Think about that for a minute. Salesforce has more than 55,000 enterprise customers, 1.5 million individual subscribers, 30 million lines of third-party code, and hundreds of terabytes of data all running on 1,000 machines. Amazon's Web Services, in comparison, runs on about 100,000 machines I am told by someone with knowledge of Amazon's server infrastructure.


But I'm a little confused about how he takes those and jumps to the conclusion he leads the story with, that salesforce is 100x as efficient as AWS:

But still, that is roughly a 100 to 1 efficiency advantage that Salesforce has over Amazon's cloud.


In order to make that calculation, it sounds like he's assuming that Salesforce does 1-to-1 the amount of actual work (processing, transfer, etc) as all of amazon's services do. Thats a pretty remarkable proposition to make, and to hinge your entire article on, without providing any numbers to back it up.

Labels: , , ,